In re RR, Jr.

294 SW 3d 213 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 2nd Dist., 2009 - Google Scholar
Mother and Father appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights to RR and VR Mother
asserts as her sole issue, "Does the Indian Child Welfare Act [`ICWA' or `the Act'] apply to this …
Save Cite Cited by 104 How cited All 4 versions

In re DO

338 SW 3d 29 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 11th Dist., 2011 - Google Scholar
… Murray, 294 SW3d at 368; LSR Joint Venture No … Expressway Sign Assocs., 302 SW3d 866, 870
(Tex.2009); Interstate 38 Northborough P'ship v. State, 66 SW3d 213, 220 (Tex.2001) …
Save Cite Cited by 106 How cited All 2 versions

In re JJC

302 SW 3d 896 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 10th Dist., 2009 - Google Scholar
… own criteria for determining tribe membership. See In re RR, 294 SW3d 213, 217-18
(Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, no pet.). The Bureau of Indian Affairs …
Save Cite Cited by 53 How cited

Jackson v. Sparks Regional Medical Center

294 SW 3d 1, 375 Ark. 533 - Ark: Supreme Court, 2009 - Google Scholar
294 SW3d 1 (2009). 375 Ark. 533. William L. JACKSON, Appellant … sua sponte. See Jones
v. Huckabee, 363 Ark. 239, 213 SW3d 11 (2005). When Jackson …
Save Cite Cited by 40 How cited All 2 versions

Shemwell v. Com.

294 SW 3d 430 - Ky: Supreme Court, 2009 - Google Scholar
294 SW3d 430 (2009). Timothy SHEMWELL … 1). Further, the jury instructions did not violate the
principles laid out in Beaty, 125 SW3d at 212. In … drafted. Id. at 213. The …
Save Cite Cited by 21 How cited All 3 versions

In re Epperson

213 SW 3d 541 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 6th Dist., 2007 - Google Scholar
213 SW3d 541 (2007) … LEXIS 5033, at *4 (applying abuse of discretion standard of review); Ulmer
v. Ulmer, 130 SW3d 294 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (recognizing that …
Save Cite Cited by 81 How cited All 2 versions

Ex parte Lo

424 SW 3d 10 - Tex: Court of Criminal Appeals, 2013 - Google Scholar
… 294, 38 SW2d 592 (Tex … [3] 977 SW2d 144, 146 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (Keller, J., dissenting),
analysis adopted by Ex parte Young, 213 SW3d 327, 331 (Tex.Crim. App.2006) …
Save Cite Cited by 456 How cited All 2 versions

State v. Kahookele

640 SW 3d 221 - Tex: Court of Criminal Appeals, 2021 - Google Scholar
… Id. at 213 (Kelly, J., dissenting) … at 214. IV. Statutory Interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a
question of law, which we review de novo. Tapps v. State, 294 SW3d 175, 177 (Tex. Crim …
Save Cite Cited by 13 How cited All 2 versions

IN RE ME-MN

342 SW 3d 254 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 2nd Dist., 2011 - Google Scholar
… Holick, 685 SW2d at 20-21; In re RR, 294 SW3d 213, 233 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, no pet.).
Termination decisions must be supported by clear and convincing evidence. Tex …
Save Cite Cited by 166 How cited All 2 versions

IN INTEREST OF VLR

507 SW 3d 788 - Tex: Court of Appeals, 8th Dist., 2015 - Google Scholar
… 25 USCA § 1912(f); In re RR Jr., 294 SW3d 213, 217 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, no pet.);
Doty-Jabbar v. Dallas County Child Protective Services, 19 SW3d 870, 874 (Tex …
Save Cite Cited by 15 How cited All 2 versions